Connect with us

World

Plan to End Birthright Citizenship ‘Unconstitutional’

Published

on

Kellyanne Conway’s husband, lawyer George Conway said in an op-ed published on Tuesday that the president’s proposal to end birthright citizenship was “unconstitutional.”

“Sometimes the Constitution’s text is plain as day and bars what politicians seek to do. That’s the case with President Trump’s proposal to end ‘birthright citizenship’ through an executive order,” he wrote, referring to the 14th Amendment which grants this right. “Such a move would be unconstitutional and would certainly be challenged. And the challengers would undoubtedly win,” Conway adds, along with Obama-era U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal.

On Tuesday, Conway’s wife and White House counselor, Kellyanne said “there are constitutional scholars that say the 14th Amendment has been misinterpreted, and, actually, the Supreme Court has never gave a solid opinion on this,” comments which greatly contrast that of her husband.

President Donald Trump said earlier in the day that he would end birthright citizenship with an executive order.

“They’re saying I can do it just with an executive order. It’s in the process. It’ll happen … with an executive order,” the president said.

The 14th Amendment, added to the Constitution 150 years ago, says that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Conway calls the language of the amendment “simple and clear,” suggesting that there is no doubt as to what it implies.

The two men further note that the 14th Amendment itself doesn’t allow for an exception to its guarantee of birthright citizenship.

On the other hand, Kellyanne Conway said for Fox News that birthright citizenship was being “misused,” pointing to the fact that many countries in Europe and Asia do not have that.

“France ended theirs in 1993 — and most parts of Asia, many parts of Asia don’t have it. So many others, constitutional scholars, have argued that the 14th Amendment has been misinterpreted or misused in this way,” she stressed.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Iran Blocks Nearly All Internet Access

Published

on

Iran imposed an almost complete nationwide internet blackout on Sunday one of its most draconian attempts to cut off Iranians from each other and the rest of the world as widespread anti-government unrest roiled the streets of Tehran and other cities for a third day, The New York Times reported.

The death toll for the three days of protests rose to at least 12; hundreds were injured; and more than 1,000 people have been arrested, according to semiofficial news agencies like Fars News.

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the last word on all state matters, called the demonstrators “thugs” and endorsed the government’s decision to raise prices it sets for rationed gasoline by 50 percent as of Friday and by 300 percent for gasoline that exceeds ration limits. Even after the price hike, gasoline in Iran is still cheaper than in most of the rest of the world – now the equivalent of about 50 cents a gallon.

In a speech on Sunday, Khamenei said he would support rationing and increasing gas prices because heads of three branches of government had made the decision.

Khamenei also acknowledged that Iranians had taken to the streets to protest and that some had died – however, he blamed the protests on monarchists and opposition groups trying to destabilize Iran, the Times added.

The widespread discontent on display across the country marked yet another crisis for the country. Iran has been struggling with an economic crisis after the United States exited a nuclear deal and reimposed harsh sanctions that ban Iran’s oil sales.

Continue Reading

World

HASC Chairman Claims Legislation to Create a Space Force in 2020 ‘Still Possible’

Published

on

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith said last week that negotiations on the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act are “proceeding reasonably well” but he expressed doubt that the NDAA will include language to authorize a Space Force as a separate military branch, SpaceNews reported.

“It’s still possible but by no means guaranteed,” Smith told reporters on Capitol Hill last week. When asked for specifics, Smith said, “I don’t think it would be helpful for me to make predictions.”

The biggest sticking point in the NDAA negotiations is language in the House version of the bill that restricts the use of military funds to pay for the wall that President Trump wants to build along the U.S.-Mexico border, SpaceNews adds.

There are other dealbreaker issues. The authorization of a Space Force as the sixth branch of the armed forces is one of them, Smith said. Other contentious matters include extending the “war powers” legislation that authorizes the president to use military force, and allowing transgender people to serve in the military.

Smith said the House and Senate NDAA conference in recent weeks worked on compromise language on hundreds of provisions and “reduced the stack significantly, and we’re down to a few really contentious issues.”

Smith characterized the Space Force as a “higher echelon” issue that is proving divisive. Both Republicans and Democrats in the House and Senate continue to have reservations about the administration’s Space Force proposal, said Smith. “There is bipartisan concern on the proposal and bicameral concern about the specifics of that proposal.”

The House version of the NDAA creates a Space Corps and is closer aligned with what the administration proposed. The Senate bill would rename the Air Force Space Command the U.S. Space Force and does not specifically authorize a sixth branch of the armed forces.

Smith noted that the House has been a proponent of a military space branch since 2017 while the Senate had adamantly opposed it. “In their bill they didn’t have the same language that we did. But the president has persuaded them to look at it differently.”

Continue Reading

World

Gunman Kills Four at California Backyard Party

Published

on

Police in the California city of Fresno were investigating a mass shooting at a football game party on Sunday in which at least 10 people were shot, killing four, with five others left in critical condition and another wounded, Reuters informs.

Three men died at the scene and another died at a hospital, Fresno Deputy Police Chief Michael Reed said in a late night news conference. Six more were hospitalized, he said.

“Our hearts go out to the families of the victims of this thing,” Reed said. “This was senseless violence. We’re going to do everything we can to find out who the perpetrators were and bring them to justice.”

A gunman walked into a backyard and started shooting at a south Fresno home, where a gathering of about 35 family and friends was watching a football game before 8 p.m., said Reed. Neighbors soon flooded 911 dispatchers with calls for help, Reuters adds.

The suspect fled the scene and police were combing the neighborhood for witnesses and possible security camera footage, police said. Police did not release further information about the shooting in the city about 200 miles (320 km) north of Los Angeles, except that the dead were men between the ages of 25 and 35.

Continue Reading

Files