The chairwoman of the upper house of Russia’s Parliament, Valentina Matvienko, is urging lawmakers to move quicker with several bills regulating cryptocurrencies, Cryptofeed.ru reported.
Matvienko has led Russia’s Federation Council since 2011 and recently spoke to officials, including some in the Ministry of Digital Development, Communications and Mass Media and the Upper House Committee for Economic Policy, inquiring why there have been delays considering the bills, which could number as much as 20. Most of the legislative pieces were presented to Parliament’s lower house, the Duma, a year ago and no progress has been made since.
Similar to what has been seen with legislators in the U.S., the lawmaker asserts that Russia is in a great position to lead the way on crypto adoption, but delays in regulations are forcing companies to look elsewhere to launch their operations.
The Duma has already stated that it hopes to push forward with crypto adoption. Earlier this month, the chairman of the legislative body, Vyacheslav Volodin, said that the digital economy bills, including those that cover digital financial assets and digital rights, are to be a priority in the upcoming parliamentary session. He added that lawmakers in the country need to institute a legal environment that favors digital innovation and which would lead to a strong digital economy.
Anatoly Aksakov, the head of Russia’s Committee on Financial Markets, publicly stated that parliament would act on at least one crypto regulation bill soon. He asserted that the Duma will review the legislation by the end of February.
In May of last year, a crypto bill received support by Russia’s parliament during its first reading. However, after it received criticism by some in the crypto industry, it was scrapped and sent back for revision. Not much movement to introduce crypto regulations to the country has been made since then.
If Russia’s Parliament stays on course and introduces crypto regulations before the end of spring as it has indicated, it will become one of a handful of countries that have been able to establish a legal framework for digital assets. It would also beat the U.S. to the punch, with U.S. lawmakers apparently dragging their feet on providing crypto regulatory guidance.
Iran Blocks Nearly All Internet Access
Iran imposed an almost complete nationwide internet blackout on Sunday one of its most draconian attempts to cut off Iranians from each other and the rest of the world as widespread anti-government unrest roiled the streets of Tehran and other cities for a third day, The New York Times reported.
The death toll for the three days of protests rose to at least 12; hundreds were injured; and more than 1,000 people have been arrested, according to semiofficial news agencies like Fars News.
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has the last word on all state matters, called the demonstrators “thugs” and endorsed the government’s decision to raise prices it sets for rationed gasoline by 50 percent as of Friday and by 300 percent for gasoline that exceeds ration limits. Even after the price hike, gasoline in Iran is still cheaper than in most of the rest of the world – now the equivalent of about 50 cents a gallon.
In a speech on Sunday, Khamenei said he would support rationing and increasing gas prices because heads of three branches of government had made the decision.
Khamenei also acknowledged that Iranians had taken to the streets to protest and that some had died – however, he blamed the protests on monarchists and opposition groups trying to destabilize Iran, the Times added.
The widespread discontent on display across the country marked yet another crisis for the country. Iran has been struggling with an economic crisis after the United States exited a nuclear deal and reimposed harsh sanctions that ban Iran’s oil sales.
HASC Chairman Claims Legislation to Create a Space Force in 2020 ‘Still Possible’
House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith said last week that negotiations on the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act are “proceeding reasonably well” but he expressed doubt that the NDAA will include language to authorize a Space Force as a separate military branch, SpaceNews reported.
“It’s still possible but by no means guaranteed,” Smith told reporters on Capitol Hill last week. When asked for specifics, Smith said, “I don’t think it would be helpful for me to make predictions.”
The biggest sticking point in the NDAA negotiations is language in the House version of the bill that restricts the use of military funds to pay for the wall that President Trump wants to build along the U.S.-Mexico border, SpaceNews adds.
There are other dealbreaker issues. The authorization of a Space Force as the sixth branch of the armed forces is one of them, Smith said. Other contentious matters include extending the “war powers” legislation that authorizes the president to use military force, and allowing transgender people to serve in the military.
Smith said the House and Senate NDAA conference in recent weeks worked on compromise language on hundreds of provisions and “reduced the stack significantly, and we’re down to a few really contentious issues.”
Smith characterized the Space Force as a “higher echelon” issue that is proving divisive. Both Republicans and Democrats in the House and Senate continue to have reservations about the administration’s Space Force proposal, said Smith. “There is bipartisan concern on the proposal and bicameral concern about the specifics of that proposal.”
The House version of the NDAA creates a Space Corps and is closer aligned with what the administration proposed. The Senate bill would rename the Air Force Space Command the U.S. Space Force and does not specifically authorize a sixth branch of the armed forces.
Smith noted that the House has been a proponent of a military space branch since 2017 while the Senate had adamantly opposed it. “In their bill they didn’t have the same language that we did. But the president has persuaded them to look at it differently.”
Gunman Kills Four at California Backyard Party
Police in the California city of Fresno were investigating a mass shooting at a football game party on Sunday in which at least 10 people were shot, killing four, with five others left in critical condition and another wounded, Reuters informs.
Three men died at the scene and another died at a hospital, Fresno Deputy Police Chief Michael Reed said in a late night news conference. Six more were hospitalized, he said.
“Our hearts go out to the families of the victims of this thing,” Reed said. “This was senseless violence. We’re going to do everything we can to find out who the perpetrators were and bring them to justice.”
A gunman walked into a backyard and started shooting at a south Fresno home, where a gathering of about 35 family and friends was watching a football game before 8 p.m., said Reed. Neighbors soon flooded 911 dispatchers with calls for help, Reuters adds.
The suspect fled the scene and police were combing the neighborhood for witnesses and possible security camera footage, police said. Police did not release further information about the shooting in the city about 200 miles (320 km) north of Los Angeles, except that the dead were men between the ages of 25 and 35.